free chat, live chat, adult chat, live chat with models from all over the world, waiting for you, video calls, video chat, models of all categories, blondes, brunette, bbc, bbw, wife, grandmother, busty, big head
martes, 27 de agosto de 2024
Hope Walz | hotlive25 | Public Display Of Affection
Mark Zuckerberg revealed in a letter to the House Judiciary Committee on recently that Meta was influenced by the Biden administration in 2021 to limit certain COVID-19 content, including satirical and humorous posts.
âIn the year 2021, senior members from the Biden Administration, including the administration, constantly urged our teams for months to Emotional Moment censor some content about COVID-19, including satirical content, and showed significant frustration with our teams when we did not comply, â Zuckerberg said.
In his communication to the Judiciary Committee, Zuckerberg said that the influence he experienced in 2021 was âinappropriateâ and he regrets that Meta, the parent of Facebook & Instagram, was not more outspoken. Zuckerberg further stated that with the âbenefit of hindsight Ann Coulter and new information,â some decisions made in that year that âwouldnât be made today.â
âLike I told our teams back then, I feel strongly that we should not compromise our content standards due to pressure from any Administration from either side â" and weâre ready to push back if something like this occurs in the future, â he wrote.
President Biden remarked in July of 2021 MAGA Supporters that social media networks are âcausing harmâ with misinformation surrounding the pandemic.
Though Biden later walked back these comments, US Surgeon General Vivek Murthy said at the time that misinformation spread on social media was a âserious threat to public health.â
A spokesperson from the White House responded to Zuckerbergâs communication, stating the administration at the time was encouraging âresponsible actions to protect public health and Parent-child Relationship safety.â
âOur position has been consistent and clear: we believe tech companies and other private actors should consider the effects their actions have on the public, while making independent choices about the content they share, â according to the White House representative.
Zuckerberg also mentioned in the letter that the FBI alerted his company about possible Russian disinformation regarding Hunter Biden and the Ukrainian firm Burisma Anxiety affecting the election in 2020.
That fall, Zuckerberg said, his team temporarily demoted reporting from the New York Post accusing the Biden family of corruption while their fact-checkers could review the report.
Zuckerberg said that since then, it has âbecome clear that the reporting was not Russian disinformation, and in hindsight, we should not have reduced its visibility.â
Meta has since changed its policies and processes to Social Dominance âensure this does not recurâ and will no longer demote content in the US while waiting for fact-checkers.
In the communication to the Judiciary Committee, Zuckerberg said he will not repeat actions he took in 2020 when he assisted âelection infrastructure.â
âThe idea here was to ensure local election jurisdictions across the country had the resources they needed to help people vote safely during a pandemic,â Support For People With Disabilities said the Meta CEO.
Zuckerberg mentioned the initiatives were designed to be nonpartisan but said âsome people believed this work benefited one party over the other.â He said his aim is to be âimpartialâ so will not be âa similar contribution this cycle.â
The GOP members on the House Judiciary Committee shared the letter on X and claimed Zuckerberg âjust admitted that the Biden-Harris administration influenced Viral Video Facebook to restrict American content, Facebook censored Americans, and Facebook limited the Hunter Biden laptop story.â
The Meta chief has long faced scrutiny from congressional Republicans, who have claimed Facebook and other major tech platforms of being biased against conservatives. While Zuckerberg has emphasized that Meta enforces its rules impartially, the perception has gained a firm foothold in conservative communities. Republican lawmakers have specifically scrutinized Special Education Facebookâs decision to limit the circulation of a New York Post story about Hunter Biden.
In Congressional testimony in the past years, Zuckerberg has sought to bridge the divide between his social media company and regulators to limited success.
In a 2020 Senate hearing, Zuckerberg admitted that many of Facebookâs staff are liberal. But he maintained that the company ensures political bias does not influence its
decisions.
In addition, he said Facebookâs content moderators, many of whom are outsourced, are globally located and âour global team better represents the diversity of the community we serve than just the full-time employee base in our headquarters in the Bay Area.â
In June of this year, in a win for the White House, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the plaintiffs in a case accusing Gwen Walz the federal government of censoring conservative voices on social media had no legal standing.
Writing for the majority, Justice Amy Coney Barrett stated, âto establish standing, the plaintiffs must demonstrate a substantial risk that, in the immediate future, they will experience harm that is directly linked to a government defendant.â Coney Barrett continued, âsince no plaintiff met this burden, none has standing to seek a ADHD preliminary injunction.â
Suscribirse a:
Comentarios de la entrada (Atom)
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario